3mo
why are there so many articles about issues with "AI data centers". should they be talking about the issues with the tooth fairy too.
1
0
1
0
3mo
well the actual reason is obviously that companies love to lie through their teeth about what they're actually building. i should run the numbers again to make sure my assumption that nvidia's sales numbers are far too small for "AI data centers" to actually be a thing that exists is still correct, haven't checked in a while
2
0
0
0
User avatar
illy [Shrimple-mode] protomoji_orange_flag_lesbian @illyBytes@shrimp.imsofucking.gay
3mo
@leo i havent done the numbers but even with the same constant revenue let's say to keep it simple 1 billion
month 1 is 1 bil
month 2 is 1 bil
even when that doesnt increase, that still means the amount of products that have existed has doubled (+100%) i can see how companies just buying the same stock of gpu would mean they'd run out of space, cus a single data center can like only fit that many gpus before you have to build a new one
1
0
0
0
3mo
@illyBytes well the other argument is
companies started claiming they were spending absurd amounts on constructing "AI data centers" very suddenly
these data centers would only actually become operational if there was demand for them
demand would presumably have to have risen similarly rapidly for this to be the case
building a data center takes several years
this implies there would be a period of demand massively outstripping supply. there is no indication i have seen that this actually happened
2
0
1
0
User avatar
linear cannon @linear@nya.social
3mo
@leo @illyBytes they're being built entirely on speculative demand, the demand never existed. they just assumed it would.

"if you build it, they will come" and all that.
2
0
1
0
3mo
@linear @illyBytes yes but this still implies they aren't actually operational which precludes most of the negative consequences being attributed to them
2
0
1
0
User avatar
linear cannon @linear@nya.social
3mo
@leo @illyBytes ah, like, water and electricity use and such?

because yes, if you do the actual research, the water use is mostly an imaginary issue except where increased power usage drives it in power stations. and power usage is going up in areas that already have datacenters or the few that have had them built (like the region i live in).

there's still a hell of a lot of construction-related impacts going on, though, and construction is one of the larger oft-ignored sources of carbon emissions
2
0
1
0
3mo
@linear @illyBytes i think construction impacts are a plausible concern yes but are datacenter projects actually significant relative to the rest of the construction industry?
1
0
1
0
User avatar
linear cannon @linear@nya.social
3mo
@leo @illyBytes quick estimate based on monetary spending figures on construction in the US suggests: doubtful? but not sure

according to census data the US spent upwards of $2,100 billion on construction projects in October of 2025

according to a few sources, the
total amount spent in 2024 on "AI datacenter" construction was only $54 billion, globally

a few big companies made bigger commitments than that during 2025 but it's extremely unclear to me how many of those actually happened, which i think is part of the issue more broadly
1
0
1
0
User avatar
linear cannon @linear@nya.social
3mo
@leo @illyBytes my concern is that our power grid is already inadequate and strained and i do not see the power delivery infrastructure being built out that is necessary to sustain even a fraction of what they are claiming to be deploying

and that some projects that already have been built solved this by running their own inefficient high-emissions natural gas plants onsite and finding loopholes in regulations meant to make this illegal
2
0
1
0
User avatar
illy [Shrimple-mode] protomoji_orange_flag_lesbian @illyBytes@shrimp.imsofucking.gay
3mo
@linear @leo yeah like xAI's like 2 dozen+ gas turbines that are like making air unbreathable
0
0
0
0