nvm codeberg's stance is to only remove shit coins and from defnull's interpretation, crypto projects that dont harm codeberg's reputation arent banned lol
@illyBytes hm, well, i could see, that 'crypto projects' being soo broad it includes like idfk "AES" implementation; or something, which would be silly--, what other types of cryptocurrencies shit is there, besides shitcoins :?
@Li wallets for mainstream cryptocurrencies, monero stuff, mixers, alternative firmware for some crypto wallets that lets them be used as hardware secure storage, stuff like that
@illyBytes not to mention monero actually doesn't have transaction logs, which makes cryptos only good usecase, (i.e buying drugs and/or things the state declared 'bad'-) actually practical, and mixers and stuff play into that too- pretty much essential for user safety and such; i guess-
(.. i dont knnow, i think i have a more nuanced view on cryptocurrencies than i do on say AI. because atleast cryptocurrencies, can be used to buy drugs, and HRT-)
@Li@illyBytes cryptocurrencies are a way of doing capitalism in bypass of the state, it is still capitalism however so it sucks but at least it enables wider hrt access so might as well tolerate it
@illyBytes this one rembers being told by a mastocel in a discussion of this kinda thing that "oh its a different legal model, see in germany they act on the intention behind the legislation, not the precise words!!" but that makes no sense
for one thats cancerously neurotypicalese but also if everything is vague and up to interpretation by default then you can just interpret the rules however the fuck you want then do whatever the fuck you want
@hsza@illyBytes its not the same as having no rules, no rules means you can do what you want, its the same as having someone just be able to just decide what your doing breaks some 'rule' that they just made up or whatever,
@Elizafox@illyBytes "the constitution is so important guys!!1! stand up for the flag!!!" "anyway we decided we'll be ignoring the constitution here and here and here"
@illyBytes@Elizafox yeah thats a big part of it, checks and balances matter not when they can all be trivially bypassed
but it is also inherent to power structures that have grown beyond the personal scale. theyre unable to properly represent the population, thus unstable, and eventually self-destructive
@Elizafox@illyBytes at some point society could draw the right conclusions from this and start working toward a coordinated transition away from having empires whatsoever